2Tg.	1.13.7 PTR Discussion - Class Issues
2Tg.	WoW Classic Version 1.13.7 PTR is Now Available
2Tg.	WoW Classic Version 1.13.7 PTR is Now Available
22Tg.	Invasion Over - Turn In NPCs Gone
1Mtl.	Patchwerk Hateful Strike not Blizzlike

1Mtl.	WoW Classic Hotfixes -- Updated January 20
1Mtl.	T3 Warlock 4 piece bonus bugged
1Mtl.	Heigan the unclean - Naxx bug spot
1Mtl.	WoW Classic “Not A Bug” List - Updated Dec 3, 2020
1Mtl.	Naxx Teleport to Sapphiron Bug

Neuste News

Alles anzeigen »

1Tg.	How the Spell Batching Change in 1.13.7 Impacts Everything in WoW Classic
2Tg.	WoW Classic Version 1.13.7 PTR ist ab sofort verfügbar
9Tg.	Unique Strategies for Efficiently Clearing Naxxramas
15Tg.	Atiesh, Hohestab des Wächters von Spielern in WoW Classic vervollständigt
17Tg.	New Naxxramas Speedrunning Rules on Warcraft Logs

23Tg.	PSA: Don't Accept Code from Untrusted Sources
1Mtl.	WoW Classic Questionairre - Burning Crusade Separate from Fresh Start Servers Restarting with Phase 1
1Mtl.	WoW Classic Feast of Winter Veil Holiday Event Guide (December 15 - January 2nd)
1Mtl.	Comparing Kel'Thuzad Strategies from 2006 to Classic WoW's Modern Approach
1Mtl.	Blizzard ändert den Eingangsbreich von Classic Naxxramas zur unteren Eingangsplattform

Classic

Blizzard plant Bug des Verbesserten Waffentotems zu beheben - Gruppe sollte von erhöhter Angriffskraft profitieren

geposted 24.09.2020 um 15:33 von perculia

Verbesserte Waffentotems

Blizzard

Has anyone done testing on Improved weapon totems not giving the 30% increased Attack power gain on everyone in the group and not just the shaman? From multiple vods and from talking to shamans. While looking at our current Attack power, only the shaman gets the bonus Attack power from improved weapon totems. While everyone else is stuck with only a 315 Attack Power gain. Which means every shaman that has spec’d into this talent is giving no benefit to any melee in their group.

Kommentare

Anmelden um Kommentar zu erstellen 17 Kommentare

Kommentar von CasCassCaschThey should totally fix AV since it's clearly a bug too they fixed in BC.Kommentar von 1538291736My whole life is a lie...Kommentar von Dudebr0Could they remove the debuff/buff limits as well since they were a technical limitation and not a design intention that was fixed in BC. I wouldn't mind being able to use my full dps rotation.Kommentar von EyevouOf course they are going to fix it.... with the release of burning crusade classic. LULKommentar von SaankaaThe Burning Classic confirmed for "the near future"?Kommentar von Deatheyes(as well as several other issues that were similarly bugged in original WoW but were clearly incorrect behavior)Kommentar von SultxWho else doubts that blizz will finally address the Paladin's issues with Consecration with this wave of fixes?Kommentar von PMMickRemovedKommentar von NavaraIt was recorded that Aliance once won AV, which is non-canon and therefore this buff for the Horde.Kommentar von warbaloonis adding 1.35 dps on mainhand auto swings really going to have a "significant impact"
it's a terrible talentKommentar von PartywagonHow about fix the attack speed e'ko while you're at it!Kommentar von KalwekHow about fix the attack speed e'ko while you're at it!Kommentar von HerrakorvaThis clearly shows how blizzard is double standarded. Juju Flurry was kept the same with the same exact reasoning.

here is the proof: https://eu.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/juju-flurry-buff-%E2%80%93-not-a-bug/117855

If that link does not work here is what they say in it:

"Hi All,

We would like to mention that the Juju Flurry buff is currently matching the behavior exhibited in the 1.12 reference client. Juju Flurry behaves similarly to Seal of the Crusader in that it increases your attack speed but also lowers your DPS by the same amount.

We also did some digging into our bug database from the Original WoW era and found that we had in fact filed a bug for this behaviour while the original game was current, but the issue was not actually fixed until the Burning Crusade pre-patch (patch 2.0.3). As this bug was present throughout Original WoW, we do not currently consider it to be a bug and is merely an aspect of the original game that was carried over into Classic.

Thank you!"

So clearly something is up in here. Something, very, very, very double standardedKommentar von pimpindacribSo clearly something is up in here. Something, very, very, very double standardedwe do currently have plans to fix this (as well as several other issues that were similarly bugged in original WoW but were clearly incorrect behavior) in an update coming in the near future.Kommentar von MorbidjbyrdThis is still a totally worthless talent... It's quite laughable that it was recommended by the pirated server players. Anyone that specs 22/29 should just delete their shaman.Kommentar von r4z0r84does this mean no more diamond flask as it was also fixed in the same patch in TBC?Kommentar von r4z0r84@morbidjbyrd Yeah man couldn't agree more, its legitimately 12 more dmg on wf procs for a 1.8s speed weapon. put the 20% chance onto it as well and thats an extra 2.4dps by 4 so 9.6 extra dps, if not double as they'd be using two so legit best case 19.2 dps increase for the whole raid. so worth losing 5% crit and 10% healing efficiency /sarcasm.

« Nächster Post

Vorheriger Post »

Blizzard plant Bug des Verbesserten Waffentotems zu beheben - Gruppe sollte von erhöhter Angriffskraft profitieren

Kommentare

Schreibe einen Kommentar